Search Content

Great googly-mooglies, how much do we have to dumb down the starter sets so that people learn how to play the game?

Everyone seems to want to write a tournament report. The theory is that if everyone else writes a tournament report, then you will learn how various decks respond to other decktypes. In reality, most people writing tournament reports actually tell you very little about their decks, and far more about the tournament experience. They tell…

Will people whose first PT is PTNY feel the same sense of thrill and accomplishment? I doubt it.

Who are these strange men, these Level 4 people who make strange rulings in distant lands? Sheldon provides a handy introduction.

“When your deck is different, people fail to understand the proper approach to take to win. If you’re not winning with your different deck, why play it?”

An epitaph for the rock singer Stangg, more cheap Magic, and sexy card names that the editor didn’t even catch!

Wizards may not spell it out in the rulebook, but it’s there clear as day: We want it all. And they give it to us, or at least what we ask for.

It’s hard to imagine a world without BBB for B — but in the end it has been a long time coming, and this could be one of the best things to happen for the game.

Land destruction means getting your opponent’s (or opponents’) land off the table and into the graveyard. But can you do it with five players?

I plan in pointing out to people when I feel their lack of speed is jeopardizing the match’s outcome. Maybe they’ll see the errors of their ways.

In sensitivity toward those readers without dogs, this article will ignore the full title and focus only on card advantage and you.