Search Content

Two hundred and fifty cards. Thirty-five creatures. How the heck do you expect to win with this sort of ratio? Well, mostly you use blue.

David discusses his experience at Worlds and the state of internet articles today. Oh, and although he won’t say it, we will: VOTE FOR THE KING OF BEATDOWN IN THE INVITATIONAL!

So it’s Sunday evening and we’ve just finished making dinner and I ask Alice,”Anything on TV tonight?” “Um, only <insert random bad movie here> and some movie called Rounders.” “?” I say.”I’ve heard of that, that’s apparently very good.” “Well,” she says,”I think I’m gonna read in bed.” Woot – Rounders for me then. Maaaaaaan,…

A trip to a different store (NOT Our Beloved StarCity) yields an entirely new experience…

The last time Rizzo’s wife and eggs went on vaca, we got”Searching For Wakefield.” Now we get this. It’s a tad randomer, don’tcha think?

All right, all right; U/G/R has ONE good deck. But I’ll eat my hat and coat if I see any U/G/R decks in the Top 8 at Denver.

It’s sort of strategy, sort of not; discussions on bathroom breaks and game losses, and Cooked Goose – the new”fun” IBC blue-beater.

Good god, perhaps one of the best multiplayer articles ever written! So what if the deck costs a couple hundred dollars? Just read this!

The word of the day is Collusion. Say it with me, now – Collusion. What does it mean and what do you do?

An Earthquake ripples through the Top 25 as the best multiplayer red cards shift and change…

…and then things get awfully weird on the blue side, as Propaganda falls to #6.

Tony wants to poison you, then get marked… For cards!

I miss netdecks. Boy, would they make testing IBC easier.

Colorscrew defines this format. Wizards has tried to lead us to multicolor decks with potent cards, but make no mistake – you will pay the price.