Welcome back! Ravnica has Returned, and it’s time to get our draft on. I have had the opportunity to draft the new Ravnica set seven times so far, and am
really enjoying the format. With that being said, seven times isn’t enough to make any brash claims that I’ve solved it by any means; however, I do feel
that I am getting a grasp on how the format works, what is important, and what seems to have been working for me thus far.

Right off the bat, in the first week of drafting the format, there seems to be a consensus that straight Selesnya and Rakdos appear to be strong
strategies. They are fairly straightforward, (the Selesnya deck wants a lot of things that make tokens and cards with the keyword “populate,” and the
Rakdos deck wants to have an aggressive curve of ‘unleash’ creatures and removal) however, as we are not always so lucky as to be passed the nuts two color
guild of our choice, sometimes we need to branch out beyond the obvious.

WHAT DOES A BLUE CONTROL DECK LOOK LIKE?

With that being said, I wouldn’t deter people from looking for ‘the nuts’ on color guild deck-in fact, my two best draft decks so far have been a GW and a
BR deck. However, in both of these cases the deck, tailor made, was passed to me and I was simply in the right colors. The next two best decks that I have
had the privilege of playing were three color control decks. One was Bant (UWG) and the other was RWU.

To start out, here is what one of my control decks have looked like so far:

R/W/U Control

Brian Demars

Test deck on 10-14-2012

Ravnica Limited

Creatures (13)

Lands (17)

Spells (10)

Sideboard

Here is the other:

G/W/U Control

Brian Demars

Test deck on 10-14-2012

Ravnica Limited

Creatures (15)

Lands (17)

Spells (8)

Sideboard

I ended up 2-1 with both of these decks, but I think that they were both good enough to be 3-0 decks. With the RWU deck, I ended up making a play mistake
that resulted in me getting blown out by an onboard trick (the UW Guildmage has two abilities, d’oh!), and I ended up getting badly color screwed in a
match with the Bant deck. I understand that mana screw is going to be a potential problem with a three color deck, but it was one of those games where if I
ever draw my third color I easily win, so it was within reach for both of these decks to be 3-0 decks.

It is also relevant in, at least in my mind, that these decks that were capable of winning two or three games, and that they are not really rare or bomb
heavy. In a sense, they seem to be reasonable decks to be able to consistently draft. The RWU deck has the 7cc Arbiter and a Martial Law, and the Bant deck
has an Azor’s Elocutors and a Loxodon Smiter. Good cards to be sure, but Jaces, Hypersonic Dragons, or Mizzium Mortars they are not.

With all of that being said, let me talk about what these two decks have in common and why I think these commonalities are really important for the control
archetype. First of all, both of these decks have four four-drops with four or more toughness. One thing I noticed about the staple “best archetypes” BR
and GW are that both decks rely really heavily on the aggressive board presence created by three-power creatures. In particular, a lot of the unleash
creature end up being 3/2, 3/3, or 3/4s and also importantly, the most common token that Selesnya wants to be populating are 3/3 centaur tokens.

“Centaur Token is the ‘card’ that RtR limited revolves around.”

Havning an abundance of creatures that can effectively defend against Centaurs and Unleashed three-drops is a really good way to make it to the late game.
Having two 2/4s in play creates a ton of problems for the aggressive creatures, as it will often create a situation where they simply cannot attack you
anymore without simply sacrificing a creature every turn if you double-block.

I also like having a lot of four drops that fit this mold, because of this specific scenario: You drop a 2/4, and they attack with their 3/3, they attack
and you block…even if they have a combat trick to kill the guy, most of the tricks (aside from a few of the GW tricks) cost two or more mana, so it will
cost them their turn. In which case, you can often just untap and play another fatty which will brick them again.

“I like big butts and I cannot lie.”

I think that these three cards are really the key to making three color blue decks work. I have not gotten a chance to draft Grixis yet (which would be the
last tri-blue control deck) but I assume the Ogre Jailbreaker would be the man of choice to fill that niche.

Also, and this goes without saying:

“Um, this card is ridiculous.”

I’m happy to be casting 4cc creatures with four toughness in this format, and this is a 2cc creature with four toughness. I know that when I was playing
Rakdos and Selesnya and had those “good beatdown” hands, that this guy was really good at making hands that I thought were unbeatable have to work really
hard. With that being said, as of right now I actually think this might be the best common in the set, or at least really close to it.

Another thing that I’ve found interesting about this format is that counterspells actually seem to be better than they normally are in Limited formats.
Both Syncopate and Cancel have been finding their way into my draft decks routinely and are actually outperforming my expectations. One reason for this is
that I often find myself setting up board stalls, and my opponent will wait to make an attack until he or she sets up a profitable combat trick. By having
a counter in hand during the attack step, one goes from getting two for one’d to blowing the opponent out of the water. Counterspells also have the added
bonus of simply stopping a 6cc mythic rare bomb as well.

Another thing to keep in mind is that after the first game when the opponent sees that you have a bunch of x/4s, they are likely to bring in combat tricks.
I have been keen to pick up a thirteenth-pick Dispel to jam in my sideboard and am pretty liberal with sideboarding it in if I think extra pump spells are
likely to come in. I’m not bold enough to jam Dispel in my maindeck over a Cancel (yet), but I’ve been pretty impressed with the card and will likely try
it out soon.

WHY WOULD ONE DRAFT A THREE-COLOR BLUE CONTROL DECK AND NOT A TWO-COLOR DECK?

I have already stated that I think BR and GW are probably the most powerful and consistent performing decks I’ve seen so far. So, with that being said:
“Why wouldn’t a player just draft BR or GW every time?”

Well the answer is quite simple: if it were that easy, every single draft table would have four GW drafters and four BR drafters. An eight-man draft simply
cannot support every single player trying to force straightforward archetypes.

When I start out a RtR draft I am always ideally looking to draft a two color deck. However, a lot of the time (and this is especially the case with a
multicolored set like Return to Ravnica) one can spend their first three or four picks taking reasonable cards in a two color combination only to find the
wellspring drying up really quickly.

For instance when I drafted the Bant control deck, my first three picks went like this:

I was feeling pretty good about these picks-I mean, Selesnya is clearly open, right?

Wrong.

The guy next to me was also in GW! His first two picks were Trostani, Selesnya’s Voice and Vitu-Ghazi Guildmage. It became pretty clear when all of the GW
cards dried up.

I wasn’t going to just abandon three insane GW cards and start over in a new archetype. Since blue seemed to be the most open color, I simply dipped into
that vein and expanded into a three-color deck that could use what I already had while moving toward what appeared to be more open.

The guy to my right didn’t want the Giant Spiders in his populate deck, so I was able to steal those from him, and because Green was being cut so hard from
the right I was able to get more GW in pack two. Essentially, I was able to switch into UW from the right, and take the GW from the left.

The other thing that is kind of nice about the three-color versus two-color decks is that the Guildgates are cards that are pretty reasonable to pick up in
the middle of a pack. Unlike the original Ravnica bouncelands as the mana fixers at common, which were clearly first picks almost no matter what, the
Guildgates are cards that the two-color decks don’t really need, as they are not so insane that one can’t not pick them. However, having dual lands at
common is really important for enabling three-color decks to consistently fix their mana.

If you are building a three-coor deck and know it going into pack two, I don’t think it is unreasonable to first- or second-pick a gate. They are basically
the best cards in a three-color deck because they allow a player to simply play with all of the best cards from two guilds (as opposed to two-color decks
that only get one guild). I have ended up being able to draft 3-4 mana-fixing lands in my three-color decks, but I pretty aggressively take them. If I know
I am roped into playing three colors, I value the gates higher than almost anything: the exceptions being bomb rares and first-pick-quality on-color gold
cards such as Guildmages, Frostburn Weird, Izzet Staticaster, Skymark Roc, or Centaur Healer. Depending on how late it was in the draft and how many gates
I had to fix mana, I could see picking a gate over these cards late in a pinch. I wouldn’t like it, but it might be the play.

One might also want to branch into a third color to accommodate playing a really, really powerful bomb rare opened in the second pack.

For instance, if I were drafting a UW deck and I opened up:

“Too good to pass…”

It is reasonable to expand from two colors into a third to accommodate a really, really good card like a dragon.

CARDS THAT ARE MUCH BETTER THAN THEY LOOK IN THREE-COLOR BLUE CONTROL DECKS:

“(Not) every body’s heard about the bird.”

When RTR came out a lot of people described this card to me as “unplayable,” and as somebody who plays it often, I am going on record as saying those
people are wrong.

Seller of Songbirds is good for the same reason as:

“A blockade that makes a blocker.”

Both of these cards are fairly cheap, but come with a lot of value attached. Perhaps most importantly about both these cards is that they are straight
white cards that make tokens to populate. While UWR is not generally going to be a deck that revolves around populating for obvious reasons, sometimes
there is simply value to be had for the taking. There are few decks in this format that play white where I wouldn’t play Trostani’s Judgment, for instance,
but I’m pretty unlikely to have a token to populate. Cards like Seller of Songbirds and Security Blockade are decent cards on their own, and the fact that
they are mono white token generators is, simply put, gravy.

I have been really impressed with the Seller. Making two permanents is really important when trying to stabilize against aggressive decks. Not to mention
the absolute look of disgust your opponent will inevitably give you when he plays Brushstrider on the draw and you play Seller. Ick!

I actually had a game where I Dramatic Rescued a Seller of Songbirds that was blocking a Rakdos monster, which was pretty sweet value.

The Blockade is basically “make a 2/2 Knight and prevent six to eight damage over the course of a game.” I kept count in my last draft; in a three-match
draft, Security Blockade prevented 32 damage for me (not including whatever value that my Knight ended up getting me). I can only imagine how sweet it
would be to have two copies of this card going at once.

“I’m saved, and in epic fashion!”

Dramatic Rescue is a card that has exceeded my expectations in this format. For one, is awesome at blasting Centaurs off the board. Second, it is great at
protecting 2/4s from combat tricks. Third, it is sweet when somebody plays a card that “populates” and then suddenly they don’t have a token to populate.
Gaining two life is also surprisingly relevant, especially against Rakdos decks that will often sacrifice cards to push through damage.

For instance, it isn’t uncommon for a Rakdos player to attack a 3/2, 3/4, and 5/4 into your board of 2/4 and 2/2. With a Dramatic Rescue, this tactic ends
up working out rather poorly for them…

“Inaction Injunction what’s your function? Locking down fatties, fliers, and blockers…”

Inaction Injunction easily passes the eyeball test as being a solid card, but when I’ve put the card to use it has exceeded my expectations. It is a really
versatile card and it basically does every thing I want it to in a control deck. It buys time, makes my opponent’s attack step awkward, and digs me through
my deck toward my finishers. One can’t go overboard on drafting these in extreme multiples, and they can’t replace playing creatures, but I always want a
copy or two of this card in my deck.

“Better than advertised.”

I actually think that the Gates are better than the Keyrunes by a pretty wide margin. I don’t want to fix my mana on turn four. I want to fix it on turn
one, for free. I can’t even begin to explain how much easier it is to win a game of RtR draft when I start a game with a Gate in play than when I don’t.

Casting my spells, whatever spells I want, whenever I want, is a tremendous boon and the Guildgates make it so easy. I strongly suspect that three color
decks are going to be important in this draft format, especially as we move forward and learn more about the how RtR draft works. I am certain that getting
and utilizing Gates will be paramount.

Experimenting and learning about RtR draft format has been a really fun and rewarding format for me thus far. It seems like there are a lot of possible
avenues to explore moving forward, and the new cards are really fun to play with. So far, I think that populate is the most interesting mechanic from the
new set, and it appears to be powerful. “Unleash,” while not as interesting, also seems to be rewarding to build around, as overpowered-undercosted
aggressive creatures are always worth casting.

So, last but not least, my five favorite RtR cards that I’ve gotten to play with in limited thus far!

“You’ve got to appreciate that Vintage Fender design.”

Playing with this card makes me feel techy, even though it is basically designed to create cute blowouts. It is almost impossible not to play this card in
some sweet dramatic fashion and out of nowhere wreck an opponent’s day, making what looked like a profitable attack quickly devolve into a rout.

It is also worth noting that in a RWU Control deck, (and this play came up frequently) an attack of multiple three-toughness creatures into two 2/4s was
met with a Staticaster to finish off both attackers…

“Block, don’t block, it doesn’t matter because you’re dead either way…”

This card makes combat for the opponent absolutely miserable. All of the Guildmages are completely off-the-charts awesome, but this one is particularly
miserable to play against (and for that matter, gleeful to play with!), as it creates situations where they literally cannot block without losing all their
guys, but must block or else take even more damage! Rawr, Rakdos!

“Every single time I’ve cast this card, my opponent died.”

I don’t know what else to say. Every time I cast this card in an aggressive deck, my opponent dies on the spot. I don’t ever remember a Threaten being this
good.

“When Izzet a dead draw? Nivix.”

It seems like every time I have this card it creates some sweet blowout in my favor. I wish all of my draft decks could play four.

“Pleased to Vitu.”

Vitu-Ghazi Guildmage is absolutely amazing, because it can simply overwhelm and defeat opposing decks all by itself. At the top of the GW deck’s curve, its
best non-rare spell is Courser’s Accord, and once you get to eight mana, the card lets you essentially cast Accord, without using a card, every turn. It is
hard to live long in a world where your opponent gets two free Hill Giants every turn.

Hope you guys are all enjoying RtR as much as I am…

Cheers,

Brian DeMars