In “Beating Reanimator,” I brainstormed an aggressive Bant deck that I thought might be good against G/W/B Reanimator due to its evasion—something most aggressive decks in Standard lack but which I think is very important against that particular deck.
After writing the article, I decided I was curious about how the deck would do, so I decided to record some videos with it. I knew that the list I wrote about was a sketch and that it was built around the goal of beating Reanimator—which is an important first step but not the only thing a Standard deck needs to do—so I reworked it a little to prepare for the metagame I expected on Magic Online. I came up with this:
Creatures (27)
- 3 Invisible Stalker
- 3 Geist of Saint Traft
- 3 Restoration Angel
- 3 Wolfir Silverheart
- 2 Lyev Skyknight
- 1 Loxodon Smiter
- 4 Cloudfin Raptor
- 2 Frontline Medic
- 4 Gyre Sage
- 2 Master Biomancer
Lands (24)
Spells (9)
So how does it play?
That was pretty rough. I’m clearly not fast enough to beat the aggressive decks. That’s a huge portion of the field, so this needs to be addressed.
I rebuilt the deck and am playing with this from here on:
Creatures (32)
- 3 Invisible Stalker
- 4 Avacyn's Pilgrim
- 2 Geist of Saint Traft
- 3 Restoration Angel
- 3 Wolfir Silverheart
- 2 Lyev Skyknight
- 3 Loxodon Smiter
- 4 Cloudfin Raptor
- 2 Frontline Medic
- 4 Gyre Sage
- 2 Master Biomancer
Lands (21)
Spells (7)
Considerations: I might need Blind Obedience in the sideboard or Rhox Faithmender. I also might need more Loxodon Smiters main, although I don’t like them against Reanimator.
The second game was embarrassing. These videos definitely make me look horrible at Magic. It’s a good thing their purpose is to show how a deck plays more than to show how I play. I’m pretty sure I would have won the second game (and thus the match) if I had just Selesnya Charmed the Thragtusk to exile it instead of pumping the Silverheart.
My draws in both of those games were outstanding, but that was much more like how I envisioned the deck playing against Reanimator, although maybe not always quite that well.
I really thought I had the first game. Again, this is another game where I just didn’t play very well. I’m pretty sure I didn’t need to go for the Increasing Savagery, and if I’d just passed with counters, I don’t think I could’ve lost.
The next two games made my deck look pretty good. I wonder how consistently it can do stuff like that.
Thanks for watching,
Sam
@samuelhblack on Twitter